The Ultimate Head-to-Head Showdown
Trust Score: FundingPips leads with a 4.8/5 TrustPilot rating (3,120 reviews) vs Blueberry Funded's 4.2/5 (1,543 reviews).
Entry Cost: FundingPips starts at $29 — 64% cheaper than Blueberry Funded's $25.
Profit Split: FundingPips offers up to Up to 100%%, keeping more money in your pocket compared to Blueberry Funded's 80%%.
Drawdown Mechanics: Blueberry Funded uses static equity-based (10%) while FundingPips uses balance-based (static) (10%). Static/balance-based drawdowns are generally considered safer.
Evaluation Path: Blueberry Funded uses a 1-Step evaluation model, while FundingPips offers a 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, Instant path. Fewer steps generally means faster access to funded capital.
Trading Platforms: Blueberry Funded uniquely offers none. FundingPips uniquely offers cTrader, Match-Trader.
Maximum Capital: Blueberry Funded scales up to $400,000, 1x more than FundingPips's $300,000.
News Trading: Blueberry Funded fully allows news trading during evaluations, making it ideal for traders who capitalize on NFP, CPI, and FOMC volatility. FundingPips, however, restricts trading around high-impact news events — typically imposing a 2-minute buffer before and after announcements. If news trading is a core part of your strategy, Blueberry Funded is the clear winner here.
Algorithmic Trading (EAs): Blueberry Funded permits Expert Advisors, opening the door for systematic, automated traders. FundingPips either prohibits EAs or restricts them to self-developed bots only. If you run automated strategies, this distinction matters significantly.
Commission Structure: Blueberry Funded charges FX: $7/lot. Indices/Crypto: None.. FundingPips charges FX: $5/lot. Crypto: 0.04%. Indices: None.. Lower commissions compound into significant savings over hundreds of trades — especially for high-frequency scalpers.
Consistency Rule: FundingPips enforces a consistency rule: 35% score for On-Demand. 15% for Zero accounts.. Blueberry Funded does not impose a consistency rule, making it more forgiving for traders with variable win distributions.
Forex Leverage: FundingPips offers 1:100 FX leverage — significantly higher than Blueberry Funded's 1:30. Higher leverage amplifies both profits and losses. Aggressive scalpers benefit from higher leverage, while conservative swing traders may prefer the forced risk management of lower leverage.
Payout Processing: Blueberry Funded processes payouts in 1–2 business days via Bank Transfer or Crypto, while FundingPips takes 24–48 hours via Riseworks, Crypto, Visa Direct, or Mastercard. Faster payouts mean quicker access to your hard-earned profits — an important factor for full-time traders who depend on this income.
Scaling Potential: Blueberry Funded scales up to $400,000 initial (scales to $2,000,000) (requiring 10% net profit over a 3-month period with at least 2 payouts profit per tier), while FundingPips caps at $300,000 (scales up to $2,000,000 in Hot Seat) (requiring 10%–20% cumulative profit milestones across Hot Seat scaling tiers per tier). If your long-term goal is managing large capital, the firm with the higher ceiling offers more growth runway.
Inactivity Policy: Blueberry Funded: 28 days.. FundingPips: 1 trade every 30 days mandatory.. Be mindful of these policies — an inactive account can be terminated, and you would forfeit your challenge fee and any unrealized progress.
Active Discount Codes: Blueberry Funded: Use code "CIRCLE" for 30%. FundingPips: Use code "" for a discount. These codes can significantly reduce your upfront investment — always check for active promotions before purchasing.
Starting at just $29, FundingPips offers the lowest barrier to entry — ideal if you want to test the waters without risking a large upfront fee.
Visit FundingPipsWith a 4.8/5 TrustPilot rating and 3,120 verified reviews, FundingPips offers the strongest track record and payout reliability.
Visit FundingPipsFundingPips's Up to 100%% profit split means you keep more of every dollar you earn — the difference compounds significantly over time.
Visit FundingPipsBlueberry Funded has more permissive EA/bot policies, making it the better fit if you run automated trading systems.
Visit Blueberry FundedBlueberry Funded scales up to $400,000 — giving you the highest possible ceiling for growing your funded capital over time.
Visit Blueberry FundedOur expert conclusion based on the data
When choosing between Blueberry Funded and FundingPips in 2026, the decision comes down to what matters most to you as a trader. FundingPips holds a TrustPilot rating of 4.8/5 across 3,120 reviews, while Blueberry Funded sits at 4.2/5 with 1,543 reviews. Both firms are legitimate and pay traders, but they serve fundamentally different trader profiles.
On pricing, FundingPips offers a significantly lower barrier to entry at $29 compared to Blueberry Funded's $25 — that's roughly 64% cheaper. However, cheaper doesn't always mean better value. You need to weigh this against the profit split, drawdown rules, and payout reliability.
A critical difference lies in their drawdown mechanics. Blueberry Funded uses a static equity-based drawdown at 10%, while FundingPips uses a balance-based (static) drawdown at 10%. Blueberry Funded's static drawdown means your loss limit is locked to your initial balance and never trails upward — this is mathematically safer and easier to manage, especially for swing traders who hold positions overnight.
Our Recommendation: If your priority is trust and track record, go with FundingPips. If your priority is affordability, FundingPips is the better entry point. For maximum earnings per trade, FundingPips wins with a Up to 100%% profit split.
It depends on your priorities. FundingPips has a stronger reputation with a 4.8/5 TrustPilot score. However, FundingPips is more affordable at $29. For most traders, FundingPips is the safer choice, but FundingPips offers better value for those on a tight budget.
FundingPips is the more affordable option, with challenges starting at $29 compared to Blueberry Funded's $25.
Blueberry Funded offers up to 80%% profit split, while FundingPips offers up to Up to 100%%. FundingPips lets you keep more of your earnings.
Blueberry Funded uses a static equity-based drawdown (10%), while FundingPips uses a balance-based (static) drawdown (10%). Static and balance-based drawdowns are generally considered easier to manage than trailing drawdowns because they don't chase your equity high watermark.
Blueberry Funded uses a 1-Step evaluation model, while FundingPips uses a 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, Instant model. Fewer steps generally means faster access to live funded capital.
Blueberry Funded: Allowed.. FundingPips: Trade managers only. No 3rd party black-box EAs.. Always verify your specific EA is compliant before purchasing a challenge.
Blueberry Funded supports TradeLocker, MT5. FundingPips supports cTrader, Match-Trader, MT5, TradeLocker. Both offer professional-grade execution suitable for serious traders.
Both firms process payouts reliably. Blueberry Funded pays via Bank Transfer. FundingPips pays via Bank Transfer, Crypto, Mastercard, Riseworks, Visa Direct. Check each firm's payout schedule for the most up-to-date processing times.