P
Loading
Fidelity Investments vs Interactive Brokers
The Ultimate Head-to-Head Broker Showdown
Key Differences
1
Trust & Regulation: Interactive Brokers boasts a higher trust score (98) compared to Fidelity Investments (96).
2
Account Minimum: Interactive Brokers requires a lower initial deposit of Free.
3
Features: Both brokers offer compelling tools, but Fidelity Investments focuses heavily on Stocks while Interactive Brokers is known for Stocks.
Detailed Comparison
Trust Score
96
98
Account Minimum
Free
Free
Annual Maint. Charge (AMC)
Free
Free
Equity Delivery Fee
Free
$0 (IBKR Lite) / $0.005/share (Pro)
Platforms
Web, Desktop (Active Trader Pro), iOS, Android
Web (Client Portal), Desktop (TWS), iOS, Android
Our Verdict
When comparing Fidelity Investments and Interactive Brokers, the choice depends heavily on your trading style and fee preferences. Interactive Brokers comes out slightly ahead with a higher Trust Score of 98/100, indicating stronger regulatory oversight and user satisfaction. However, Fidelity Investments might still be the better option depending on their specific account minimums and fee structure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fidelity Investments better than Interactive Brokers?
Based on our automated trust algorithm, Interactive Brokers scores higher (98/100) than Fidelity Investments (96/100). However, the "better" broker depends on the specific assets you trade and your local regulations.
Which broker has lower fees, Fidelity Investments or Interactive Brokers?
Fidelity Investments charges Free for equity delivery, whereas Interactive Brokers charges $0 (IBKR Lite) / $0.005/share (Pro). You should also consider their AMC and account opening fees.